Quite. It is interesting to see just how many people just happen to drift into the room for their first sig meeting, right in time for the vote of no confidence..

Rough consensus gets quite easy to manufacture, when organized that way.

On 26-Sep-2014 7:13 pm, "Dave Crocker" <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> This obviously allows a form of ballot-box stuffing, by permitting votes
> from people who have not been involved in the wg up to that point.  I
> have no idea how to prevent this, however.  In addition, it can be
> argued that anyone garnering enough ire to motivate the ballot-stuffing
> effort probably is causing serious problems.  The counter to that is
> that they might be standing up to efforts to coerce the wg...