![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3b6370da06b1634335bad2ad21800916.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
28 Jan
2016
28 Jan
'16
7:25 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 07:18:38PM +0100, Gilles Massen wrote: Dear Gilles
Since the rationale mentions the "better quality of abuse contact data", I'd like to point out that it is still not possible to have a different abuse-c for different inetnums, if they belong to the same ORG. The impossibility to have a "more specific" is the ONLY thing that prevents me to have accurate abuse contact data for our LEGACY addresses, not the absence of a specific policy.
Let's make a proposal for a DB-WG to deal with that and will see what is the community's point of view for that. Is it ok for You? Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl