-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Verification of abuse contact addresses ?
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
Date: Mon, March 11, 2019 12:26 pm
To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net


In message <9793c47c-2c44-47e3-033a-1d60ca4d33d2@time-travellers.org>,
Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:

>As far as I know there is nothing in any policy about decommissioning
>resources. (I'm not even sure what that would mean in practice...)
>
>I don't think that such a proposal would get consensus in the RIPE
>community, but I am often wrong so if you want this then please submit a
>policy proposal. The RIPE NCC staff, the working group chairs, or some
>friendly community member can help you with this.

It might be interesting to float a proposal to tack on a small extra
annual registration fee... say, another 12.5% or something... applicable
to all respouces for which corrections to the contact info have not been
made.

I agree that it would be politically problematic to outright kill someone's
allocations, but making it just a little painful (if they are screwing up)
might be helpful and productive.


Regards,
rfg