On 8 Aug 2011, at 10:26, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 08.08.2011 10:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
While the abuse contact wg would be good to develop a standard format for noting an abuse contact in RIPE whois, it is hardly the place to deal with netblocks registered with fake contact information, and quite possibly registered with faked justification paperwork.
I'd hope some practical hints proposition to define a workable acceptation of the term "faked" is also on-topic.
+1 "out of date", for example, is not "fake" - it's just not accurate *now* Which is a very different proposition to "faked"
RIPE's existing policies *should* cover this - but there's a notable lack of a formalized resolution process on the lines of wdprs for domains.
What is the current policy about the right to anonymity, for Whois Data Problem Reporting System?
In ICANN? That's one of the many reasons why the WHOIS policy is so badly broken
It is often said that e-commerce sites cannot be anonymous. It should be added that email sites also cannot. In fact, an email site may grant the right to anonymity to its users, but IMHO it needs not be anonymous itself for doing so properly.
Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection ICANN Accredited Registrar http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.mobi/ http://mneylon.tel Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 US: 213-233-1612 UK: 0844 484 9361 Locall: 1850 929 929 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845