In message <B6A12EA1-F7E0-422B-99B9-40F4B5C63121@a2b-internet.com>, Erik Bais <ebais@a2b-internet.com> wrote:
May I propose to do a call and explain a bit about the community and the NCC roles ? And the WG's etc ?
Thanks for the generous offer Eric, but I am fine for now, I think. Anyway, I think it is better, actually, if some of my questions get answered here, in public, on the mailing list. Then I can refer to those answers later on, when someone tells me my proposal is crap. :-) I am still awaiting answers to the following very important questions, which I have already posted. Surely _someone_ must know the answers, and the answers should be quite simple, not even worthy of taking up any voice time, as the answers should not need any explaining: In the entire history of RIPE NCC, as a formal association under Dutch law, has there ever been any instance in which The Association has applied either Section 6.1(b) or Section 6.1(e) of the Articles of Association? If so, on how many separate occasions have such terminations occured? With respect to each such instance, if any, has The Association obeyed in full the stipulation, as to its own behavior, which is contained within Section 10.5 of the Articles of Association? Can no one really answer these rather rudimentary questions? Regards, rfg