yes, which is why the registrar information on the domain whois are 100% accurate and all working, valid data. and no, the resources assigned by the RR, specially the legacy, is not at all the same thing. look how much of a battle and uphill struggle it was to even reach consensus on validating abuse records in terms of policy in this very wg. this, is part of the confusion. and I am not ranting about anything :) I am simply speaking my mind. Others that experience (or have experienced) the same type of things that I am speaking of, or will maybe in the future experience the same type of things, will recognise what I am saying and all of us know this: that we have to do something or we will all be done for. Andre On Tue, 29 May 2018 15:38:08 +0100 (WEST) Carlos Friaças <cfriacas@fccn.pt> wrote:
Hi,
One can argue that a "real abuse contact" related to a DNS domain is necessary for the contract's performance, no?
The same is valid about the contract between RIPE/NCC and LIRs over assigned IP address space, right?
Cheers, Carlos
On Tue, 29 May 2018, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 02:50:09PM +0200, Simon Forster wrote:
Would you be able to point to the section of the GDPR which states this? Admission: I have yet to make it to the end of the 88 pages of the act without falling asleep.
It derives (also the tenor of NOYB's filing, aiui) from Article 7(4):
"4. When assessing whether consent is freely given, utmost account shall be taken of whether, inter alia, the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is conditional on consent to the processing of personal data that is not necessary for the performance of that contract."
http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/article-7-conditions-for-consent-GDPR.ht...
cheers, Sascha Luck
The first case regarding this has already been filed: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases... <https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/max-schrems-files-first-cases-under-gdpr-against-facebook-and-google-1.3508177> I appreciate a motion has been filed. However, I???d surprised if the case purely revolved around this single point.
It is positive that some of this stuff is going to be tested in court sooner rather than later. Having said that, it may be <sarcasm> a day or two </sarcasm> before we get to see a final judgement with no further appeals.
All the best
Simon