![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9e6e91b4d19ab46d2283dee26d7d5f60.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
18 Nov
2010
18 Nov
'10
4:48 p.m.
On 17/Nov/10 14:11, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
First - I support the addition of a mandatory abuse-mailbox: field in the IRT object.
+1
1. There is no requirement that the contact information be accurate (that the mailbox exists and is monitored, action taken on reports)
2. There is no mention of what action should / will be taken in case this contact information turns out to be wrong (or deliberately faked)
I hope theses issues will be addressed next.