It is not for RIPE to abandon a policy proposal simply because a resource holder is too cheap to implement it. --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-04 New Policy Proposal (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") From: "Neil McRae" <neil.mcrae@bt.com> Date: 5/31/19 12:05 am To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net I'm subscribing to the list specifically to also position not in favour of this policy. This will generate work for the NCC that just wastes their time following up on lots of false positives. It will have _zero_ impact on the handling of abuse requests, in-fact I predict that perhaps even make response time worse. I urge the community to reject this proposal. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae neil.mcrae@BT.COM Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum