On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 00:34:25 -0700 "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
It is important to mention though, that the resource would have had to be used though, for there to have been abuse in the first place.
Defined "use".
If I announce a route to an IP block, e.g. one that isn't actually assigned to me, but then I never put anything in that block, have I "used" it?
Some what say "yes". Others would say "no".
Okay, just to be clear and precise: You agree that the definition of abuse is: "The non sanctioned use of a resource to infringe upon the usage rights of another resource" As you are now discussing what "use" means - so using a resource obtained by fraudulent methods / fake information - you are happy with just the actual act of obtaining a resource is not abuse? Andre