Ronald F. Guilmette wrote, On 08/02/2013 20:07:
In message <51151006.3070401@heanet.ie>, Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
On 07/02/2013 20:05, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Does the charter of this group include, or conversely, fail to include that the group can, should, and will advocate for the denial of resources _generally_ to those who abuse the Internet?
The reclamation of resources is not specifically stated in the charter. Of course, should the WG will it, the charter can always be re-examined.
What would be the process for initiating such a change?
The best way to do it would likely be for a member of the WG to talk to the the chairs with some suggestions and we can discuss it from there. But ultimately the WG endorses the charter, so if the WG wants a change, then a change they shall have.
However the group has had multiple interactions with the NCC in regards to the closing of LIRs and the reclamation of resources.
So, if I have understood you, you are saying that this WG has already been advocating for the denial of resources, generally, to those who abuse the Internet, correct?
That's an extremely simple description of a very complex position. It has generally been the position that those who abuse the network should not do so and things should be put in place to make it possible for resources to be reclaimed, where necessary and appropriate.
and the final document is here:
It would appear that a newer revision of this document exists:
Sorry, my mistake, I picked the wrong version. 541 has also been updated: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-578 Can you just check your questions still apply to this version? Brian