24 Mar
2019
24 Mar
'19
1:05 a.m.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
Our intent is NOT to "stop" the attack with the claim (not efficient at all), but to allow to be reviewed in order to avoid it, in the future, if possible from the same actors.
Not efficient at all. As demonstrated above in the thread, the same actors would then apply for a next LIR with a totally new commercial entity. At that point I don't understand anymore the problem you're trying to solve. -- Töma