On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 10:23 AM Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
Do supporters need to specify which parts of the proposal's text are more
meaningful for them?
Perhaps one of the Chairs can shed some light.
They in fact have done that before. To quote:
---- start ----
From: Brian Nisbet<brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> Date: Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 10:12 AM Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2019-03 New Policy Proposal (BGP Hijacking is a RIPE Policy Violation)
[..] To clarify, the discussion on this proposal is a discussion, not a vote. When judging consensus the Co-Chairs will look at the points made during the discussion, not count the +1s. Of course it is useful to get a feeling for general agreement, so simple statements of support or dissent are very useful, but they are not the core of the thing.