On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:30:02 +0000 Richard Clayton <richard@highwayman.com> wrote:
In message , ox <andre@ox.co.za> writes
The people that are actively using RPZ to "protect" their users are finding that it is a piss poor method and that their users are as compromized as any other non RPZ user pool.
that's a testable hypothesis -- what evidence do you have for it ?
Hindsight is always perfect. SpamCop is a DNS blocklist (which by the way IS and Ethical Anti Abuse Tool) it is reactive (after it has happened) abuse reporting system, with statistics. https://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=map Anyone can compare the abuse range volumes with that of a provider they know to be using PRZ I am not at liberty to discuss my own knowledge and personal experience in terms of specific companies. Andre