Hi,
And at the end, if all the IRT Object holders show up and say we do not need the irt object anymore as soon as we have an abuse-c in place, there would not be a reason to keep the irt any longer.
If this proposal was adopted then I can't see the IRT object being widely adopted outside of the TI community. I'm not saying that this is a good or a bad thing but readers of the proposal should be made aware of this. I think it needs to be mentioned in the proposal as an argument against it.
It was over all not widely adopted until now. I do not know how much IRT Objects we ave at the moment and how much percent of the IP space they cover. But you are right, I think this could be added as an argument against it. I have made a notice and I will add it with the next version. Thanks for mentioning it.
That would at least acknowledge how you think this proposal will lessen the confusion of how to publish contact information and not simply add another choice into the confusion.
True. Thanks, Tobias -- abusix