On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:56:05PM +0200, ox wrote:
so, still, there has been no objections to the verification process - if you have an objection to the process or would like to contribute an improvement, please do so Sascha?
OK, so for the avoidance of doubt among the trolls and the rules lawyers: 1) I object to the verification process proposals as floated on this list and i 2) I stand by my interpretation of the IA as stating that the NCC has no mandate to impose arbitrary hoops on members to jump through. Have I made myself sufficiently clear? On a further note, there is a discussion in the DB-WG with the goal of enabling delegation of more specific abuse-c for assigned or sub-allocated resources. The verification process, if implemented, should take care not to conflict with this. rgds, Sascha Luck