7 Nov
2015
7 Nov
'15
10:15 p.m.
In message <20151106224453.GG47126@cilantro.c4inet.net>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <aawg@c4inet.net> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 11:38:52PM +0100, Sander Steffann wrote:
But the RIPE NCC isn't an official party in that contract. The contract is between end user and LIR.
Well... Considering that such a contract must be submitted to, and approved by, the RIPE NCC (or it will not result in the assignment of resources); I'm of the opinion that a court might well see the NCC as a party.
It is both refreshing and surprising to finally find something that Mr. Luck and I can agree on. Regards, rfg