Hi, On 08.11.10 16:14, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. [mandatory reference to irt objects in the inetnum, inet6num and aut-num objects in the RIPE Database]
assuming I used the right keywords, I get the following numbers from a recent version of the ripe.db: lysis@ra:~$ egrep -c '^org-type: *LIR' ripe.db 8838 lysis@ra:~$ grep -c ^irt: ripe.db 216 So nearly 9000 LIRs and 216 irt objects registered. Let us assume for a minute that only 50% of those LIRs are interested in creating inet[6]nums for assigning IP addresses to their customers. So your proposal is basically saying: 4300 LIRs should each write an e-mail to RIPE NCC explaining how they handle abuse in their organization and requesting an irt object and RIPE NCC should evaluate all those requests in a rather prolonged process. Furthermore, all future PI assignments to end users need to have an irt reference, so all new PI holders also need to form an abuse team and document this accordingly through the RIPE NCC. I am also very curious how PI assignments to individual persons will form such an abuse team. Although there is a "me" in team I don't think this will work. In conclusion: Really? Kind regards, Marcus -- man-da.de GmbH, AS8365 Phone: +49 6151 16-6956 Petersenstr. 30 Fax: +49 6151 16-3050 D-64287 Darmstadt e-mail: ms@man-da.de Geschäftsführer Marcus Stögbauer AG Darmstadt, HRB 94 84