The access side is about the largest adopter of whatever IP connectivity works for them wih a minimum of effort.  So decisions will vary across providers, sure.<span></span><br><br>On Friday, June 28, 2013, Marco d&#39;Itri  wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Jun 28, Suresh Ramasubramanian &lt;<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;ops.lists@gmail.com&#39;)">ops.lists@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>

<br>
&gt; There has been little or no reason to adopt v6 so far, other than as an<br>
I have a great reason: I am out of v4 addresses and I want to turn up<br>
new customers.<br>
<br>
&gt; With some majors like Google starting to adopt it, and with only a few<br>
&gt; years left for a v4 aftermarket, carrier grade nat etc to have any effect,<br>
There is no noticeable v4 market and NAT is only relevant on the access<br>
side. I don&#39;t do access.<br>
<br>
--<br>
ciao,<br>
Marco<br>
</blockquote><br><br>-- <br>--srs (iPad)<br>