In message <4CA25A63.3090608@abusix.com>, Tobias Knecht <tk@abusix.com> wrote:
So, ah, maybe the Right Place To Start would be for somebody (perhaps even this working group?) to propose at least some sort of a policy (e.g. on hijacked ASNs and/or address blocks) for RIPE's consideration (?)
I do agree that in the absence of any policy to even investigate, a web form for submissions isn't going to help a lot.
I have done a policy proposal for APNIC which was discussed in the last meeting, but didn't find consensus. See more about this here: http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-084
That proposal seems quite reasonable. What were the objections? Is it appropriate to assume that the main objections were to this part? - After the 60-day period has passed, if the object owner has not verified their object details, APNIC will add the ranges of resources maintained by the non-responsive object owner to the publicly available list of resources described in 4.5.1 below. Regards, rfg