Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2010-08 New Policy Proposal (Abuse contact information)

One mandatory place for abuse contact information. That is it. Nothing more, nothing less.

Unless you migrate or delete data that won't be the case, you still have it littered all over the place.

Imho you and Leo Vegoda are mixing up the data quality and the work quality. Data quality judges the quality and the accuracy of the data given in the object and has absolutely nothing to do with the abuse work done behind the email address.

Again, this proposal has the risk of lowering data quality and people should be aware of that. Anyway, you and I agree that's clear and lucky this is a consensus model so I will stop here. Pointless to keep reposting the same arguments over and over... Groet, MarcoH (still no hat, getting cold)