Thomas, On 19/01/2018 15:44, Thomas Hungenberg wrote:
On 19.01.2018 13:08, Marco Schmidt wrote:
The way that abuse reports are handled by the receiving party is usually defined by the internal procedures of the providers and not by RIPE Policies.
If the abuse-mailbox is valid but the resource holder constantly ignores abuse complaints sent to this mailbox for a longer time (no response, no action taken, phishing sites or botnet c2s etc. not taken down) - what is the process to escalate this (probably finally leading to the resource being withdrawn)?
There is no process being proposed for this in 2017-02. This proposal is about validation of the abuse-mailbox attribute. If the community would like there to be the possibility of further action in relation to this specific situation, then a separate policy proposal would be required. Thanks, Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG