Hi Sascha
On the RIPE community side, I find these statements problematic:
"[LEAs] also have a right to help shape RIPE Policy using the
Policy Development Process."
They do? My understanding of the PDP is that *individuals* make
policy proposals and *individuals* discuss them. Is this no
longer the case? Is RIPE policy now made by lobby groups and other
"interested" organisations? And, yes, I am aware that individuals
may be fronting for an organisation, this does not, in my
understanding, mean their voice carries any more weight.
"Part of my job is to help LEAs understand this process and how their suggestions on changing policy would impact the broader RIPE community, such as making changes to the RIPE Database, for example, that would make it easier for them to find the closest service provider to an end user engaged in criminal
activity. This isn't special treatment, though �the RIPE NCC also helps governments, network operators, banks, business owners or anyone else interested in submitting a policy proposal do these things as well. It's part of our job as
the RIPE secretariat."
I was under the impression that this is the function of the NCC
Impact Statement within the PDP. Neither does ripe-642 mention
any discussions with or "help" from the NCC prior to the working
group process. Perhaps someone can amplify on this?
rgds,
Sascha Luck