In message <EA68C6C9-B6F4-4B41-AF1E-FF63C174B164@blacknight.com>, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
RIPE members and NCC staff should have the ability to face their accuser, but if they're hiding behind a veil of anonymity that's problematic. Personally I also find it very hard to engage in any meaningful debate with "someone" if I have absolutely no idea who they are, who they represent or what their agenda is.
+1 I concur 100%. Moreover, I think it's not even a good use of bits to go around "casting aspersions" from behind a veil of secrecy. I confess that I myself hdo use and have used anonymous accounts on some platforms, but never for advocacy of anything where I had some hopes of people taking my words seriously. Regards, rfg