12 Apr
2019
12 Apr
'19
8:14 p.m.
In message <CALZ3u+YhuC1-nho1bt6Wtj88P4PQXYkNnSevKASO_NrVmb0POA@mail.gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
Peace,
This is to continue the discussion around 2019-03. Here's our today's article about the ways some operators do traffic engineering: https://radar.qrator.net/blog/new-hijack-attack-in-the-wild
Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly intentional.
The answer, I think, should depend only on the answers to two key questions: 1) Was the routing done with the knowledge and consent of the prefix owner(s)? 2) If not, then was the routing withdrawn promptly when the route originator was notified that he/she/it was doing something wrong?