+1 I’d assume most do at this stage – it would be good to get confirmation of same Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://michele.irish ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: denis walker Reply-To: denis walker Date: Tuesday 5 May 2015 14:59 To: "anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>" Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c cleanup Hi All When the original implementation plan was put forward for "abuse-c:", the time line (if I remember correctly) was: -allowing 6 months to deploy to all members allocations -then 12 months to deploy to all independent resources -then do a cleanup The first two steps are done, but the last one seems to have been overlooked. The idea of "abuse-c:" was to create one single place/way of documenting abuse contact details. So far all that has been achieved is to add a fourth way to document it. All the old ways ("abuse-mailbox:" in 5 object types, IRT and remarks) are still littered throughout the database. I think it is time to schedule that cleanup. Can the RIPE NCC confirm that all resources now have an "abuse-c:"? cheers Denis Walker Independent Netizen