3 Mar
2016
3 Mar
'16
9:35 a.m.
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:25:50 +0900 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: <snip>
where you define responsibility. the ncc is not a regulator, it is a coordinator. if you want to be told how to run your network by weenie vigilantes, go to arin. randy
whahahaha I think the take away here is that abuse-c should contain accurate data. What is the point if that any/all of the data could be fake or is empty? Who decides what/which data fields is/are relevant/important and could be fake/non existent etc? How/if/or/whatever the specific receiver of the data responds (/dev/null - etc) is perfectly up to that network...