"Thor Kottelin" wrote the following on 23/12/2010 07:59:
-----Original Message----- From: anti-abuse-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:anti-abuse-wg- admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 9:00 AM To:<anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
In message<97C58E22-A243-4A57-9602-7184B5D3522A@blacknight.ie>, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight"<michele@blacknight.ie> wrote:
Instead of simply stating that they are alerting us to an issue they start off with a long convoluted text about their trademarks, w hich is totally irrelevant to us.
You're right. I think the way that people in the news business commonly express the point you just made is that it is bad practice to "bury the lead", i.e. its important to express the major point you are trying to make (in a news story or in an abuse report) clearly, concisely, and in the first sentence.
What was the "Subject:" line of the takedown request?
(My apologies if it was already mentioned. The archive at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/anti-abuse-wg/2010/ seems to be broken. "Archive Last Changed: 01 December 2010 17:58 CET")
The lovely people in the NCC tell me this should now be fixed. Brian.