Re: [anti-abuse-wg] the mandatory abuse field

Michele, On Tuesday, 2012-07-31 13:01:44 +0000, "\"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight\"" <michele@blacknight.ie> wrote:

Dumb question, but does the abuse field have to be an email address?

Can it be a web address instead?

I guess the idea is that some people prefer to limit the spam they get to their abuse mailboxes by requiring that people use a web form? In that case, a web address seems like a good option to me. Cheers, -- Shane