Hmm, if it is spam malware, in .ru for example (and many other countries), it may actually be be legal software. so, no.. too general maybe you mean slavery, cannibalism & child abuse? (then, the Internet may be used to assist in the crimes similar to a car used to assist in a robbery...) Which specific Internet abuse qualifies for "internationally agreed prohibited items" ? and the real question still remains: "how tech should respond to abhorrent content, and whether content should be policed by registrars, browsers, or social networks" I say no. Whichever region law enforcement should enforce laws. Not huge multinational companies enforcing their monoculture on the world. Andre On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:58:47 +0530 Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
With a few exceptions you are correct - Child abuse material, malware and such, where there is broad international consensus
On 24-Aug-2017, at 2:09 PM, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> wrote:
There can be no such thing as "internationally agreed prohibited items", as these are highly cultural. Even just inside the EU, for example, there