On 08.08.2011 10:03, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
While the abuse contact wg would be good to develop a standard format for noting an abuse contact in RIPE whois, it is hardly the place to deal with netblocks registered with fake contact information, and quite possibly registered with faked justification paperwork.
I'd hope some practical hints proposition to define a workable acceptation of the term "faked" is also on-topic.
RIPE's existing policies *should* cover this - but there's a notable lack of a formalized resolution process on the lines of wdprs for domains.
What is the current policy about the right to anonymity, for Whois Data Problem Reporting System? It is often said that e-commerce sites cannot be anonymous. It should be added that email sites also cannot. In fact, an email site may grant the right to anonymity to its users, but IMHO it needs not be anonymous itself for doing so properly.