Hi Shane,
I used the KKK as a bad taste metaphor to match the previous KKKKKKK
laugh.
Look, *learn to live with the contradictory* does not mean that
you have to accept any action...
Note that this WG Chair Mailing List Decision is not discussing
*actions* but ideas, comments and insults.
What I wrote could also be said as follows, plagiarizing Evelyn B. Hall
about Voltaire:
I may not agree to any of the words you say, but I will defend to the
death the right of you to say them.
Censorship can not exist. It existed in the most negative periods of human
history. We can not go back. Who use freedom of expression improperly, will
answer for their actions in the courts. The WG is not a court, the co-chair is
not a judge and the members are not a jury.
I have stated that there are many ISPs who act as criminals and / or are
accomplices to criminal customers. I can say that because I have proof.
It is quite suspect someone claims should be banned from the group who are
calling the ISPs of criminals. He should ask for evidence of this crime. Simply
banishing, blocking, curtailing, is a fascist and suspicious attitude. But I
will defend to the death the right of him to say it.
Shane, I hope I have clarified my position better.
Greetings
Marilson
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] WG Chair Mailing List
Decision