[anti-abuse-wg] Support and comments - prop 2010-08

First - I support the addition of a mandatory abuse-mailbox: field in the IRT object. I have two caveats to raise - 1. There is no requirement that the contact information be accurate (that the mailbox exists and is monitored, action taken on reports) 2. There is no mention of what action should / will be taken in case this contact information turns out to be wrong (or deliberately faked) thanks suresh This statement of support is in my personal capacity as an antispam volunteer and postmaster for the past 15 years, and does not represent any statement or commitment made by my employer.