Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg wrote on 19/04/2019 15:03:
Would you find reasonable to have the rule/policy in place say for 2 or 3 years, and then evaluate its impact/efectiveness...?
No. In principle, the proposal is completely broken, antithetical to the RIPE NCC's obligations of being an address registry and Randy was right to point out that it is a proposal for a kangaroo court. We don't need to make the mistake of testing it out to make sure. It will not have any material impact on hijacking; there are better ways of handling hijacking and the proposal will have a wide variety of serious but unintended side effects, some of which have been raised on this mailing list. And it's unimplementable - the board of the RIPE NCC would have a fiduciary duty to refuse to implement it. Nick