Hi Leo
It's more about sharpening the focus. I colored this red below. I
feel eventually the RIPE NCC must adapt stronger policies to
punish non-action or disregard of action. I think it would be
better if this WG comes up with such policies which the RIPE NCC
can then adopt (or not) rather than the RIPE NCC having to react
to external pressure, e.g. from policy makers, in particular the
EU. I'm sure one can formulate this much better. I firmly believe,
that there is no way around stronger regulation, and I'd much
rather see this coming from this community than form the outside.
The regulators i see and work with are increasingly irritated and
react with totally inadequate demands, which I wont reproduce
here.
Hi Serge, On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 11:41, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:Hi Leo We can only recommend the community, obviously.I agree.So these aare the best practices We can recommend that RIPE NCC changes its rules and procedures to address certain issues. As a WG, if I'm correct we have no other power.Based on thisl, I don't understand what's missing from the draft text. Maybe you could suggest some specific edits? Kind regards, Leo
-- Dr. Serge Droz Member, FIRST Board of Directors https://www.first.org