On Wednesday 10 November 2010 12:57:31 Marco Hogewoning wrote:
On 10 nov 2010, at 11:30, Sander Steffann wrote:
That being said, I still think a single canonical place to store abuse handling information is A Very Good Thing.
+1
Be careful of what you wish for, maybe somebody can produce the same stats as I did back in 2004:
- number of inet(6)num covered by IRT - number of inet(6)num covered by abuse-mailbox attributes - Number of inet(6)num containing a remarks field with the words 'complaint' or 'abuse' in it
Creating a 'single point' makes it implicit that others should disappear and you might throw away a load of data and you don't know what you will get back for it.
I am missing your point here. These might be a lot of garbage data. What is wrong about have ONE consistent way to publish abuse contacts? Don't you find this "A Good Thing"? Kostas
Groet,
MarcoH