On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 05:53:07PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote:
There has been very little discussion on the below and there is just under a week remaining in the discussion phase. So, now is your time to talk about it!
you asked for it. The policy text needs a copy edit - "publicly published" is confusingly confusing.
-rewording of the section 1.0
I believe this part makes sense, except that It doesn't clearly state that the resolution time ought to be part of the statistics, as well. I'm not convinced that we need a policy for this, though.
-new section 2.0 and consequent renumbering of the other sections
This part is worrying. First because it defers details to the implementation and second because it suggests to give the reporting party unconditional access to an unspecified level of detail. What's the legitimate interest of the reporting party in monitoring the progress? What level of detail is envisioned? Without that being specified (and available for review) I do not support the progress of this proposal. -Peter