On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Thor Kottelin <thor.kottelin@turvasana.com> wrote:
That is really a side issue though. My point was that MAAWG and RIPE are dissimilar communities with dissimilar memberships. Whether those dissimilarities are minor enough for RIPE to refer to MAAWG documents instead of continue creating its own is a matter for consensus.
Er, the very same memberships if you look at organizations. If the IP and routing people come to RIPE and make one set of policies, without knowing anything at all about what their colleagues from the very same SP's abuse and security teams are doing at other events .. what does that say?
It is the volume that hurts, not the percentage.
Yes that's why I was more like "put yourself in the shoes of a large provider first". -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)