Entirely depends on the audit&#39;s conclusions.<div><br></div><div>1. Shell company in romania or the ukraine - &quot;the documents say it is a registered company&quot;. Stop.</div><div><br></div><div>2. Hosting snowshoe spam or malware or whatever.  &quot;the justification just says &quot;hosting&quot;. stop&quot;</div>
<div><br></div><div>:)<span></span><br><br>On Tuesday, June 25, 2013, Frank Gadegast  wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:<br>

<br>
Sounds like a good start ... but I doubt if this should<br>
be the job of the anti-abuse-wg or its chair.<br>
<br>
I would rather prever, if there would be somebody<br>
at the RIPE NCC having this job, and setting up<br>
another wg maillinglist (like <a>abuse-audit@ripe.net</a>) ...<br>
<br>
I personally do not like to be flodded with<br>
discussions about specific networks, that<br>
might or might not be audited again ...<br>
<br>
If this gets changed, Im +1<br>
<br>
<br><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br>--srs (iPad)<br>