Okay my "vast" majority was a bit misleading. I meant the majority of users/companies already in whois :-) So just the natural persons remain. But why should their right on their private data not count? Again do not want to defend whois hiding. But is still an important question which right overweights the other. Just because some bad guys hide behind privacy service whois that does not mean everyone who wants to hide their whois is a criminal. Cheers tobi ----- Originale Nachricht ----- Von: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Gesendet: 05.05.18 - 16:21 An: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] abuse of the internet by multinationals and nation states
In article <60cf421.bf1cb7eb.163301149ea@gmx.ch> you write:
I don't want to defend whois hiding but you forget to mention that this does not only help criminals to hide but also protects (a bit at least) the privacy of the wast majority of "uncriminal" normal users.
To point out the obvious, the vast majority of "uncriminal" normal users do not have personal domains so their information would never appear in WHOIS in the first place, and the vast majority of domains are registered by organizations which have no privacy rights, not natural persons who do.
We've been pointing this out for a decade to academics who imagine themselves to be privacy advocates. They have consistently stuck their fingers in their ears "la la I don't hear you" so I doubt it'll be any more effective this time.
Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly