Hi, On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
Peace,
This is to continue the discussion around 2019-03. Here's our today's article about the ways some operators do traffic engineering: https://radar.qrator.net/blog/new-hijack-attack-in-the-wild
Should that also be treated as a policy violation? This is clearly intentional.
First question that comes to mind is: Would you be willing to become one of the experts in a voluntary experts pool? -- if 2019-03 happens to get somewhere, obviously... Second question: Is the policy violation emerging from AS263444 to be treated as a policy violation? (if i read well your article, i would say "yes") Third question: Is this overloading of rogue ASNs on your prefix's AS_PATH something that should also be considered a violation? (i really don't have an answer for that...) Thanks. Regards, Carlos ps: will forward this to the LACNIC list.
-- Töma