On 09/08/16, 5:51 PM, "anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net on behalf of andre@ox.co.za" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net on behalf of andre@ox.co.za> wrote:
how do you know that it is not some law enforcement effort at entrapment of criminals?
And how do I know that you, or any other of the naysayers opposing these policies, actually have any sort of a background or job role related to abuse management instead of merely allocating IP addresses or operating DNS? Linkedin, I guess. In any case, drilling down on one case isn’t the issue here. Preventing the misappropriation of v4 address space by these entities is more to the point here, though I doubt it will ever be discussed in a usable manner, given the hackneyed arguments raised here over the years. --srs