There are of course multiple sides to that story <span></span>as well.<div><br></div><div>Like a massive infestation of rock phish domains which, too, were knowingly disregarding local law, and were present in rather massive quantities on the .at ccTLD at that time.</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement/7/">http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/statement/7/</a></div><div><br></div><div>--srs</div><div><br>On Wednesday, June 26, 2013, Wilfried Woeber  wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Erik Bais wrote:<br>
[...]<br>
&gt; For those that want to read up on what actually happened on that specific<br>
&gt; incident in Latvia (July/August 2010), have a read on the following open<br>
&gt; letter from CERT.lv<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf" target="_blank">https://cert.lv/uploads/uploads/OpenLetter.pdf</a><br>
<br>
And this actually wasn&#39;t the only or the first &quot;incident&quot; with Spamhaus.<br>
They also tried similer *piep*^Wbullying against NIC.at before.<br>
<br>
Which actually has discredited Spamhaus in my personal opinion for sure,<br>
for knowingly disregarding local law, but that&#39;s slightly OT here - but<br>
maybe not...<br>
<br>
&gt; Erik Bais<br>
<br>
Wilfried.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br>--srs (iPad)<br>