Brian Thanks for sharing this A couple of notes: - there seems to be an assumption that “quality” and “responsiveness” are somehow linked. - the flow for ccTLD domain lookups seems to jump from the IANA DB directly to the CERT, which seems like overkill. The whois data *might* provide contact information that would be useful or failing that the hostname lookup would give the hosting provider / ISP. (or maybe I’ve misread the chart?) Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 On 20/01/2016, 16:22, "anti-abuse-wg on behalf of Brian Nisbet" <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net on behalf of brian.nisbet@heanet.ie> wrote:
Colleagues,
The group working on this document (L. Aaron Kaplan, Mirjam Kühne, Christian Teuschel) have produced a new draft. This draft contains a number of updates, based on feedback from the community.
The main changes are:
- clarified terminology such as abuse handler, security incident, registrant, national CERT, etc. - clarified problem statement - removed specific mentioning of name-based services in the problem statement - used "European" examples - added API details for Nation CSIRT DB - elaborated on conclusion and next steps
This document was sent to me earlier in the week, but for various reasons I didn't manage to forward it on to you all until now. With the TF-CSIRT meeting happening next week it would be great if we could gather any further feedback before the end of this week, but I realise that is quite a short term period, for which I apologise. So I'm not proposing a hard cut-off by end of day on Friday, but I think it would be extremely useful if people could try to post to the list before then.
This would hopefully allow the authors to go to the TF-CSIRT meeting with a very nearly final draft and then complete it shortly afterwards.
Certainly I would propose no more than a working week to receive other feedback, so we'd be looking at the end of Wednesday 27th.
Thanks,
Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG