![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/296c2094b1de39ba00ea926c061d4fda.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:39 AM Carlos Friaças via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
And how will a dutch court determine a wrong decision was made? by getting a different set of experts...?
E.g. by judging on an evidence found later, and with that evidence making a decision that original set of experts did their job poorly. NCC has arbiters for quite a while. Who's responsible for their mistakes?
It shouldn't be the RIPE NCC, if the RIPE NCC is just following the defined policy.
Honestly, I think it's the opposite. If the NCC terminates a membership agreement, it should be liable for all the consequences of a wrong decision no matter how exactly the decision is made and what arbiters/experts/oracles/grandmoms were asked for a definitive advice. -- Töma