- anti-abuse-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/current policy (was: Re: Allocation of number resources)
by Athina Fragkouli 12 Feb '13

12 Feb '13

Dear colleagues, We would like to address the matter raised about the "Closure of Member and Deregistration of Internet Number Resources" procedural document (ripe-578), and in particular the following sections: - B.1.1.b Invalidity of original allocation/assignment criteria Internet number resources are allocated/assigned based on a specific need. When the original technical requirements or the business purpose for the use of the Internet number resources change, the allocation/ assignment becomes invalid. If the RIPE NCC notices any change in the original technical criteria or the original business purposes for using the Internet number resources, the RIPE NCC is authorised to deregister the relevant Internet number resources. - B.1.1.e Fraudulent request If a Member has submitted a fraudulent request for an allocation or an Independent resource (for example, by providing incorrect purpose/need or falsified information about the network, etc.), the RIPE NCC will deregister the relevant records. In section B.1.1.b "the RIPE NCC is authorised to deregister the relevant Internet number resources" whereas in section B.1.1.e "the RIPE NCC will deregister the relevant records". There is indeed a difference in the way we handle these two cases. Section B.1.1.b describes two cases: a) Assignments: Assignments are justified by a specific technical need. If the RIPE NCC finds that the original assignment criteria are no longer valid, we are authorised to deregister the assignment. In most cases when the original criteria are not longer valid, however, the reason is that the business of the end user has changed, and while the original criteria are no longer valid, there is still a valid technical need for address space. In such cases, we normally evaluate the "new" justification and update our records because deregistering one assignment while at the same time registering a new one is an unnecessary bureaucratic exercise. b) Allocations: Allocations never have a specific technical need as justification. An allocation is a block that is reserved for an LIR to make assignments out of. As such, the justification for an allocation is the business the LIR operates, which requires them to make assignments. Only when an LIR ceases to operate the business that requires it to make assignments would the allocation become invalid. But if the allocation is based on a fraudulent request (section B.1.1.e), this is clearly an offense. The RIPE NCC will certainly deregister the resources if there is evidence that the request was based on falsified information. Kind regards, Athina Fragkouli RIPE NCC > *From: *"Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg(a)tristatelogic.com > <mailto:rfg@tristatelogic.com>> > *Subject: **[anti-abuse-wg] Reclamation/current policy (was: Re: > Allocation of number resources)* > *Date: *February 9, 2013 9:33:24 PM GMT+01:00 > *To: *anti-abuse-wg(a)ripe.net <mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> > > > In message <5116686A.8020208(a)heanet.ie>, > Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet(a)heanet.ie <mailto:brian.nisbet@heanet.ie>> > wrote: > >> Ronald F. Guilmette wrote, On 08/02/2013 20:07: >>> >>> It would appear that a newer revision of this document exists: >>> >>> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-541 >> >> Sorry, my mistake, I picked the wrong version. 541 has also been updated: >> >> https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-578 >> >> Can you just check your questions still apply to this version? > > Yes, they still do apply. > > I would still like to know why Section B.1.b apparently says that RIPE > NCC _might_ reclaim the improperly allocated resources whereas Section > B.1.e says quite clearly that RIPE NCC "will" reclaim the resources. > > Again, my question is: Was this difference in wording intentional and > deliberate? Or was it inadvertant and unintended? > > > Regards, > rfg >

1 0

Fradulent Companies Obtaining Resources
by Ronald F. Guilmette 12 Feb '13

12 Feb '13

Given that I recently reported here a group of fradulent Romanian companies that had managed to obtain resources... for application to less-than-honorable goals... this recent news story seems both timely and apropos: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/05/digitally_signed_banking_trojan/

1 0

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Sony Copyright Infringement
by Reza Farzan 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

2 1

Sony Copyright Infringement
by Wayne Roberts 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

Sorry to say this but I don't believe it is the Sony corporation, Based on; The domain he's sending from, I understand that Sony may have outsourced their copy write claims but have you looked at "their" website? it's a little blank for a copywrite claim company. The records for the domain antipirates-in.com sounds to me more like somebody is trying to hide something, Not that I'm saying the privacy option is a bad thing. Also the wording he was using in his original Email "* including the powerful internationally functional **ic3.gov" *Since we are talking about India here the fbi have no jurisdiction. * * And again the wording* "**or else get ready to be sued for damages" *does not sound like the language a lawyer would use And again "*This is the legal department of (**Sony Music Entertainment India P.Ltd **)" *yet your email address is sony.claims(a)antipirates-in.com I think it's either somebody with a grudge against mp3khan.net or somebody is having a laugh !! But if I'm wrong ......... -- - Wayne Roberts

3 2

Copyright Infringement
by Wayne Roberts 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

Sorry to complain but drop the html formatted email's they look a complete mess. Do this and you might get our attention -- - Wayne Roberts

3 2

(no subject)
by Wayne Roberts 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

apologies -- - Wayne Roberts

1 0

Digital Certificates
by Wayne Roberts 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

Hi, I know this is the wrong place to ask such a question ,But i need some independent advice, what type of ssl cert do i need to secure IIS and Exchange? I had a quick chat with versign who quoted me over a thousand pounds !! -- - Wayne Roberts

2 1

Copyright Infringement (Abuse / Notice)
by Sony Music 07 Feb '13

07 Feb '13

Hello Team RIPE, > This is to inform you that we had been continuously in touch with voxility who are into hosting providing for domains, their user / clients had been violating the Copyrights term for below details and provided links. > > we had been following up with voxility on mails / phone, but no resolution / action had been provided yet, attached proof of contact via mail. > > We Request you look closely into this matter and advise on same to go a head with legal procedure to Sue / pay damages from Voxility or Minimum to block below websites. i.e.., (mp3khan.net ) (url2.bollywoodmp3.se). > > We are also in touch with Binero regards same but no action been provided from their end too. > > > Hoping for positive response on same. (ORDA / Binero or Voxility) > > > Warm Regards, > SONY MUSIC > > > > > > > From: > > > Company Name : Sony Music Entertainment India P.Ltd. > Behalf Claimer / Name : Zubair Ali > Designation : Content Executive > Address : 92, Main Avenue, Above Tommy Hilfiger Showroom, > Santacruz West, Mumbai – 400054, Maharastra, INDIA. > Contact : 0091-22-67069000 > Web : http://www.sonymusic.com/ > > > SUB: Legal Cease, Desist Notice, Dutch Notice and Takedown Code of Conduct. > > > > This is the legal department of (Sony Music Entertainment India P.Ltd ). We have come to identify that your website / user is illegally duplicating and reproducing copyrighted material / File / Files . > > Stop duplicating the content and remove all infringing pages immediately. If you do not abide to this in the next 24 hours of this mail receipt, we will have to carry out legal proceedings against you. We will also release DMCA complaints as per Section 512 with all major search engines, hosting provider and your Ad partners. So your site will be banned permanently from the SE database and dropped from hosting. You will also be reported to all online crime control centers including the powerful internationally functional ic3.gov. > > DETAILS OF WORK: > > Movie Name : Murder 3 > Release Year : 2013 > Production : Sony Music Entertainment India P.Ltd > > Tracks: > 1) Teri Jhuki Nazar > 2) Mat Aazma Re > 3) Jaata hai tujh tak > 4) Hum Jee Lenge > 5) Hum Jee Lenge Rock Version > 6) Teri Jhuki Nazar Film Version > 7) Jaata Hai Tujh Tak Film Version > > > online location for which is : > > > http://mp3khan.net/murder_3_2013_mp3_movie_songs_download.html > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/01%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/01%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/02%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/02%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/03%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/03%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/04%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/04%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/05%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/05%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/06%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/06%20-%2… > http://mp3khan.net/music/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/07%20-%20Mur… > http://mp3khan.net/music/320/indian_movies/Murder%203%20%282013%29/07%20-%2… > mp3khan.net/music/Zip/Murder%203%20(2013)%20~190Kbps%20(VBR)%20%5BMP3Khan%5… > mp3khan.net/music/Zip/Murder%203%20%5B2013-MP3-VBR-320Kbps%5D%20-%20%5BMP3K… > > > > > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder_3_2013_mp3_songs.php > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2001%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2002%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2003%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2004%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2005%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2006%20… > http://url2.bollywoodmp3.se/murder3/%5BSongs.PK%5D%20Murder%203%20-%2007%20… > url2.bollywoodmp3.se/Murder-3-128Kbps-2013(Songs.PK).zip > url2.bollywoodmp3.se/Murder-3-320Kbps-2013(Songs.PK).zip > > All content and images is copyrighted by US laws and any kind of duplication or reproduction is illegal. > > > We want you to stop this infringement immediately or else get ready to be sued for damages (as applicable). > > > " I believe in good faith that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright or intellectual property owner, its agent, or the law. I further declare, under penalty of perjury, that the above information in my notice is accurate and that I am the copyright or intellectual property owner or authorized to act on the copyright or intellectual property owner's behalf. " > > > > > > For, > SONY MUSIC ------------------------ Powered by BigRock.com

4 3

Copyright Infringement (Abuse / Notice)
by Wayne Roberts 06 Feb '13

06 Feb '13

Thanks Brian, I was trying to think of a polite way of telling them, to take their complaints somewhere else.. -- - Wayne Roberts

1 0

Voxility
by Karl-Josef Ziegler 06 Feb '13

06 Feb '13

Hello! Simply look at: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/voxility.com and you may know the 'hat colour'. Another ISP where RIPE NCC should take action. Best regards, - Karl-Josef Ziegler

2 1