comment on "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"
Dear Mr. Schmidt, I want to make a comment on your proposal "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria“. https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 <https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05> We became RIPE member about 1,5 years ago. We have received one single /22 subnet. Due to groth requirement, we have purchased an additional /23 subnet a few weeks ago in an auction. In you proposal it is stated that for an additional /22 allocation the member „must not have transferred any IPv4 address space before“. I hope this requirement only concernes transfers away from us, not to us. Otherwise I find it very unfair that we are punished for organizing additional subnets in a legal way for our regular business. We don’t intend to trade with those IPs. Best regards, Kai Rottleb -- KNT Internet, Inh. Kai Rottleb Riethnordhaeuser Str. 71 99189 Hassleben, Germany Mail: kai.rottleb@knt.io <mailto:kai.rottleb@knt.io> Tel: 036201 61055 Mobil: 01723971017
Dear Mr. Schmidt,
I want to make a comment on your proposal "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria“. https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05
We became RIPE member about 1,5 years ago. We have received one single /22 subnet. Due to groth requirement, we have purchased an additional /23 subnet a few weeks ago in an auction.
In you proposal it is stated that for an additional /22 allocation the member „must not have transferred any IPv4 address space before“. The statement is "3.1. The LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address space to another LIR, a member of another RIR, or an End User." "transfert [...] to" should be understood as "The LIR has not
Dear Kai, Il 19/05/2016 13:08, Kai Rottleb ha scritto: transferred any IPv4 address space out of its registry" that was actually even the text in version 1.
I hope this requirement only concernes transfers away from us, not to us. Otherwise I find it very unfair that we are punished for organizing additional subnets in a legal way for our regular business. We don’t intend to trade with those IPs.
This would not affect LIRs that reiceved space.
Best regards,
Kai Rottleb
-- KNT Internet, Inh. Kai Rottleb Riethnordhaeuser Str. 71 99189 Hassleben, Germany Mail: kai.rottleb@knt.io <mailto:kai.rottleb@knt.io> Tel: 036201 61055 Mobil: 01723971017
regards Riccardo -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori@wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info@wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) --------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Kai Rottleb -
Riccardo Gori