Hi RIPE, Yes it does make sense that's why I vote in support of this proposal. Regards, Mehar Iftikhar Ahmad

From: address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net Subject: address-policy-wg Digest, Vol 16, Issue 16 To: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:00:02 +0100

Send address-policy-wg mailing list submissions to address-policy-wg@ripe.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to address-policy-wg-request@ripe.net

You can reach the person managing the list at address-policy-wg-owner@ripe.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of address-policy-wg digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Emilio Madaio) 2. Re: [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Richard Hartmann) 3. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6/32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Jamie Stallwood) 4. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Erik Bais) 5. Re: [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (Julian Seifert) 6. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (David Freedman) 7. Re: 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) (James Blessing)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:12:50 +0100 From: "Emilio Madaio" <emadaio@ripe.net> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) To: policy-announce@ripe.net Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Message-ID: <E1TpcMU-0000QD-FA@puppy.ripe.net>

Dear Colleagues,

A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-552, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy", is now available for discussion.

You can find the full proposal at:

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-10

We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 28 January 2013.

Regards

Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

------------------------------

Message: 2 Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:22:43 +0100 From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-10 New Policy Proposal (Extension of IPv6 /32 to /29 on a per-allocation vs per-LIR basis) To: Address Policy Working Group <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Message-ID: <CAD77+gSeLow2QyaVDNnCcBmmkxw2-CA9ebxac69TopbepLnCww@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Support.

Anything else would be unfair and relatively easy to work around.

-- Richard