2012-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Dear Colleagues The draft document for the version 3.0 of the proposal 2012-03, "Intra-RIR Transfers Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. The only change in the new version is: -removed a modification to the second paragraph of section 5.5, "Transfer of Allocation", in the RIPE Policy document ripe-592, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region" You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 and the draft document at: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03/draft We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 18 March 2013. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Why do we need this policy change, now that 2012-06 is approved and being implemented? MVH/Regards Ragnar
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Emilio Madaio Sent: 4. mars 2013 15:26 To: policy-announce@ripe.net Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2012-03 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (Intra-RIR Transfer Policy Proposal)
Dear Colleagues
The draft document for the version 3.0 of the proposal 2012-03, "Intra-RIR Transfers Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
The only change in the new version is:
-removed a modification to the second paragraph of section 5.5, "Transfer of Allocation", in the RIPE Policy document ripe-592, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region"
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 18 March 2013.
Regards
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
Hi, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
Why do we need this policy change, now that 2012-06 is approved and being implemented?
It's a different timeline - 2012-06 brought back 12 months, this is for 24 months. Whether you *need* this, I wouldn't know :-) - this is for the community to say. I'm just here to answer questions and to steer the process. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
* Gert Doering <gert@space.net> [2013-03-04 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
Why do we need this policy change, now that 2012-06 is approved and being implemented?
It's a different timeline - 2012-06 brought back 12 months, this is for 24 months.
I say keep it simple (and kill 2012-03). With 2012-06 in place we have a 12 months period everywhere. Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
Since IMO we still have to have needs assessment for transfers (to allow for inter-RIR transfers), I think it makes sense to allow organizations seeking a transfer to justify their need over a timeframe that is reasonable for business planning, so I support a change to 24 months for transfers. But either way, what's probably more important is that we adopt an inter-RIR transfer policy. -Scott On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger < ripe.address-policy-wg@ml.karotte.org> wrote:
* Gert Doering <gert@space.net> [2013-03-04 16:03]:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:54:53PM +0000, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
Why do we need this policy change, now that 2012-06 is approved and being implemented?
It's a different timeline - 2012-06 brought back 12 months, this is for 24 months.
I say keep it simple (and kill 2012-03). With 2012-06 in place we have a 12 months period everywhere.
Regards
Sebastian
-- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
Dear AP WG, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:26:03PM +0100, Emilio Madaio wrote:
The draft document for the version 3.0 of the proposal 2012-03, "Intra-RIR Transfers Policy Proposal", has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. [..] You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2012-03 [..] We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 18 March 2013.
*No* comments have been received that could be interpreted as "support" or "opposition" to this proposal. (There was one question which was answered, and one statement from the proposer on the reason for a new version). Based on this, the WG chairs have decided to extend the review phase by 4 more weeks. Emilio will send the announcement later today or tomorrow. If the amount of feedback we receive during those next 4 weeks stays at this, we'll then proceed to kill the proposal due to lack of interest from the community. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
participants (5)
-
Anfinsen, Ragnar -
Emilio Madaio -
Gert Doering -
Scott Leibrand -
Sebastian Wiesinger