2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Dear colleagues, Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase. This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes. The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call. As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net <mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 13 July 2023. Kind regards, Karen Hung On behalf of Policy Officer RIPE NCC
Dear AP-WG members, Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow ) As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent .. To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up. So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well. Have a nice day, Erik Bais On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Karen Hung <khung@ripe.net> Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:07 To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments) Dear colleagues, Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase. This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes. The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call. As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net<mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 13 July 2023. Kind regards, Karen Hung On behalf of Policy Officer RIPE NCC
I support this proposal. -- Wolfgang Tremmel Phone +49 69 1730902 0 | wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net Executive Directors: Ivaylo Ivanov and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135 DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net
On 12. Jul 2023, at 10:26, Erik Bais <erik@bais.name> wrote:
To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up. So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well.
I support this proposal. Greetings, and enjoy summertime Arnold On 12.07.2023 10:26, Erik Bais wrote:
Dear AP-WG members,
Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow )
As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent ..
To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up.
So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well.
Have a nice day,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair
*From: *address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Karen Hung <khung@ripe.net> *Date: *Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:07 *To: *"address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> *Subject: *[address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Dear colleagues,
Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase.
This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call.
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus.
You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02 <https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02>
Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net <mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 13 July 2023.
Kind regards, Karen Hung On behalf of Policy Officer RIPE NCC
-- Arnold Nipper Chief Technology Evangelist and Co-Founder DE-CIX Management GmbH Lindleystraße 12 | 60314 Frankfurt a.M. | Germany Phone +49 69 1730902 22 | Mobile +49 172 2650958 arnold.nipper@de-cix.net | www.de-cix.net Geschaeftsfuehrer Ivaylo Ivanov und Sebastian Seifert Registergericht AG Koeln HRB 51135 Want to work at DE-CIX: https://de-cix.net/en/about-de-cix/careers
The proposal looks ok to me. Nick Erik Bais wrote on 12/07/2023 09:26:
Dear AP-WG members,
Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow )
As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent ..
To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up.
So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well.
Have a nice day,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair
*From: *address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Karen Hung <khung@ripe.net> *Date: *Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:07 *To: *"address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> *Subject: *[address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Dear colleagues,
Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase.
This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call.
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus.
You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02
Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net <mailto:address-policy-wg@ripe.net>> before 13 July 2023.
Kind regards, Karen Hung On behalf of Policy Officer RIPE NCC
I have minor editorial nitpicks but I still support this proposal in the current form. -Cynthia On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:26 AM Erik Bais <erik@bais.name> wrote:
Dear AP-WG members,
Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow )
As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent ..
To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up.
So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well.
Have a nice day,
Erik Bais
On behalf of the AP-WG Chairs, co-Chair
From: address-policy-wg <address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Karen Hung <khung@ripe.net> Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:07 To: "address-policy-wg@ripe.net" <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2023-02 Last Call for Comments (Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments)
Dear colleagues,
Proposal 2023-02, "Minimum Size for IPv4 Temporary Assignments" is now in Concluding Phase.
This policy proposal recommends setting the minimum assignment size to a /24 while still allowing for a smaller assignment if requested by the End User. This policy proposal also allows routing requirements to justify the request for more than a /24 for research purposes.
The WG co-chairs have declared that rough consensus has been reached and the proposal will now move to Last Call.
As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of this four week Concluding Phase is to give an opportunity to present well-justified objections for those who missed the previous two phases and wish to oppose the proposal. Any objection must be made by 13 July 2023 and must be supported by an explanation. If no substantive objections are raised by the end of Last Call, the proposal will complete the PDP and will be evaluated by the WG co-chairs for final consensus.
You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2023-02
Please e-mail any final comments about this proposal to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 13 July 2023.
Kind regards, Karen Hung On behalf of Policy Officer RIPE NCC
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
* Erik Bais
Please be aware that the Last Call for Comments of the min. size for IPv4 temp assignments is about to end .. ( June 13 2023 – aka tomorrow ) As chairs we would like to receive a bit more comments / support during last call, as it has been silent .. To reach consensus, we are not only looking for objections .. but also for support of the community and this is a request to speak up. So even if you voiced support in previous phases, let us know again in the Last Call phase as well
Hi Erik, According to ripe-781 section 2.4 the Last Call phase is, quote, «mainly intended for those who missed the previous two phases and want to oppose the proposal». It goes on to state that «if there is no feedback from the community at this stage, this is likely to be regarded as consensus and it will mean the previous call of rough consensus from the WG chairs at the end of the Review Phase still holds». Silence is consent, in other words. I have therefore intentionally not commented on this proposal during Last Call. Tore
Hi,
Silence is consent, in other words. I have therefore intentionally not commented on this proposal during Last Call.
+1 to this, that’s how Gert and I always implemented it, and how I would like it to remain. Last call is a “speak now, or forever hold your peace” phase :) Cheers! Sander
participants (9)
-
Arnold Nipper -
Cynthia Revström -
Erik Bais -
Karen Hung -
Nick Hilliard -
Randy Bush -
Sander Steffann -
Tore Anderson -
Wolfgang Tremmel