I agree with Vladislav Potapov Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from du -----Original Message----- From: <poty@iiat.ru> Sender: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:44:42 To: <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> Subject: FW: [address-policy-wg] Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 Hello, I do not support this proposal. We are speaking about real possibilities and real impact. The proposers doesn't know exactly the impact of the changes and are deaf to the other people pointing to the real troubles relating the grooving number of prefixes. Their naïve assumptions about cheap BGP routers show their inability to broader the mind just outside their small nets needs. Technical requirements should be the only way of making decisions. If someone has tendency to lie - it would lie anyway - one thing or another. Regards, Vladislav Potapov Ru.iiat